Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Petition to save Doug 35....



Another amazing old growth in Concordia might be cut down by Vic Reemers and Everett Custom Homes. This could happen any day now....


Please read below and sign the petition here.




Don't demolish Doug 35 


This petition will be delivered to:
Vic Remmers


Don't demolish Doug 35



A single-family home on NE 35th Ave in Portland’s Concordia neighborhood has been slated for demolition. The developer, Vic Remmers, is planning on building two homes in this lot. As it so happens, there’s a Douglas Fir tree – hereto forth referred to as Doug 35 – on the lot that is also very likely slated for destruction.

Before we go any further, please know that this is imminent – it’s not something that might happen 2 months from now; it can happen any day, any hour! The home is already in process of being demolished and Doug 35 can go down anytime. We need your help - right now - to save Doug 35!
 So why is it important to not cut Doug 35 down?

1) Doug 35 has a diameter of 30”. According to Seattle’s tree protection ordinance (DR16-2008), a Douglas Fir tree is considered “exceptional” when it reaches a diameter of 30” and thus qualifies for preservation. Granted, this is Portland and not Seattle, but Doug 35 doesn’t care which city it happened to grow up in – it’s being cut down.

2) In 2011, the Portland Parks & Recreation Urban Forestry division conducted a study of trees in the Concordia neighborhood. They counted 4,636 trees in the neighborhood. Out of that, trees in the pine family accounted for a total of just 2.1% (96 trees). This includes Doug firs, firs, pines, spruces and cedars. The actual count of Doug Firs isn’t listed but even if we assume an even distribution, that’s about 20 Doug firs in the entire neighborhood. If Doug 35 is taken down, that’s one of out 20.


3) The same study also found that only about 1% of all trees in the neighborhood had a diameter of 30-36 inches. That 1% includes Doug 35.


4) A recommendation from the study: Retain existing large trees. Benefits and time are lost when older trees are removed and replaced with smaller and younger tree species. We don’t know what kind of tree(s) will replace Doug 35 – if any.


5) Need concrete $-based data? The study estimates that on average, each tree provides $67 worth of annual benefits. This includes – but isn’t limited to – energy conservation, air quality improvement, CO2 reduction, stormwater control and property value increase.


6) I’m not an arborist but according to the International Society of Arboriculture, there’s a relatively simple formula to get a rough age estimate for a tree. Using their formula of diameter X growth factor (which for Doug Firs is 5), we get an approximate age of 150 years. That means that Abe Lincoln was probably still alive when Doug 35 started to sprout. Even if we go with an age of 100 years, WW1 had just started.


7) On a personal note – I can see Doug 35 from my kitchen window every day. It’s a reassuring presence: tall, majestic, grand and reverent. In a world where things become obsolete faster than you can power-on your smartphone, Doug 35 is a valuable anchor, reminding you of what’s important.
There are ways to keep the tree and still build the home that Vic’s planning – this can be a win-win for all involved if he agrees to discuss it with us. Please sign this petition to let him know that you stand for Doug 35. Thank you!






Wednesday, August 20, 2014

The consequences of Concordia being downgraded to R2.5 from R5 zoning.


In approximately 2001-2002 Concordia was rezoned to an R2.5 zone but not on paper.

When doing a search on the city website, you clearly see Concordia is listed as an R5 residential zone. However, the city is treating Concordia as an R2.5 zone.

According to the cities' website, an R5 residential zone is a lot that is 36'X50' or 3000sqft.

When this neighborhood was first developed in the late 1800's to early 1900's parcels of land were sold in portions of two or more. Each house in Concordia sits on two or more plots.

Some people bought three in order to have a larger side yard. Each plot was sold at 25x100'. Almost every home in Concordia sits smack dab in the middle of two of these historical plots.

In 2001-2002, Portland decided with no judiciary oversight that it would grandfather in the original historical plots but are still calling Concordia an R5 zone.

The trouble with the city deciding to downgrade Concordia's zoning is that every home sits on two plots and any home that has a third plot is almost guaranteed to have a large 100 yr old native tree on it's side plot as people built around the trees when the neighborhood was being developed.

With the recent trend of demolitions in Portland we are all very concerned about what this means for the future of Concordia. Currently, any builder or developer could come in, buy one house, tear it down and any trees in it's way and build two or three skinny homes in it's place dramatically changing the face and character of Concordia forever.

While Portland certainly has a major issue with housing in the near future, it's important to look at how Portland can grow sustainably as well as keeping it's charm and character.

The word "infill" seems to be a word our local politicians speak like the pounding of a war drum. That infill is the only way we as a city can handle the population growth and that this is something we must all accept as Portlandians.

Though I am a firm believer in the Urban Growth Boundary, I truly beg to differ that the current approach to infill is the correct solution. If you look closer at what this really means, it means the politicians have given the green light to let builders come into established communities and wreak havoc so they can make maximum profits at the detriment to the local community.

Almost every new construction in Portland as infill is built to the maximum size the lot is allowed, towering over other people's properties and tearing down any tree in it's way. The builders boast themselves as green builders yet take down 100' tall healthy trees, feed it to a wood chipper then plop their prefab homes in it's place.

There is nothing "green" or sustainable about what they are doing and the way they are going about acquiring the properties and dividing the lots is extremely disruptive to the local communities.

Then you have to consider the demolitions.. Last year there were nearly 300 demolitions, many of them were perfectly functional homes and of those only 300 homes demolished, it accounted for 5% of all of Portland's waste.

Think about that. Only 300 homes created 5% of all of the waste generated by the entire city. These are materials that could have been reused, homes that could have been salvaged or even built up and divided to create more housing. Instead, they were torn down, thrown in the city dump and massive giant tract homes or several skinny homes were put in their place.

This isn't what Portland wants, people who move to Portland move here because we are nature oriented, love the old charm and trees and want to see the city stay that way. Not speckled by giant tract housing and skinny homes.  We moved here to get away from suburbia yet somehow suburbia seems to be encroaching into our beautiful city.

There are certainly areas in Concordia that could use more development. There are several homes in disrepair that could be taken down, replaced, restored or built up with more high unit homes like duplexes or even smaller condos that would actually make a true impact on offering affordable housing for the new people migrating to Portland.

However, that is not what these builders are doing and the city is just letting them run wild. These new construction homes often go for $100k more than any home nearby artificially inflating the market and driving housing costs up.

What the city needs to do is take a more advanced approach in it's zoning. Preserve the old neighborhoods and develop just beyond their borders.

The type of infill we are seeing in Concordia may add 20 new homes to the area at best. That's not much to help for the coming population boom but it certainly is a lot for the builders pockets as they get to maximize profits from being in a desirable area.

Yet at what cost? We are talking months of streets being closed off, sidewalks blocked, roads being dug up, beautiful historic trees being torn down, the very character and charm of what makes a community destroyed so one greedy home can be built. This just isn't right and does nothing for our very real issues of a growing city.

What local communities can do now... 

- Put a CC&R on your deed when you sell the property - 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_(law)#Covenants_related_to_land

- Do Not Sell To Developers!! -

I have now heard of three stories of developers pretending to be nice normal families who will move in and love the place. Put a CC&R on your deed and see how fast these developers will walk away from the deal. Research who your buyers are before you sell to them to make sure they aren't a developer.

- Homeowners Associations -

As much as I have always felt the idea of a homeowners association is a terrible idea, it may actually be the saving grace for Portland neighborhoods.

Many of us here in Concordia have been writing our politicians, attending neighborhood meetings, testifying at city hall and even resorting to hiring a lawyer. Unfortunately, our city and politicians are currently on the side of the builders.

Forming a local homeowners association would allow the neighborhoods to put covenants, conditions and restrictions on all neighboring properties.

Most people when they think of a homeowners association, they think of uptight neighborhoods that dictate what color you can or can't paint your home.

I believe Portlanders can and will be successful in forming smart ones that favor local residences over builders and that the CC&Rs are more designed to control what these developers can and can't do.

- Consolidate your lot -

If you are in Concordia, it is likely that your property (tax lot) is on several smaller underlying lots. These are now individual building lots.  You can "consolidate" to your tax lot perimeter and eliminate those hidden legal divisions so that any future, segregating development of your tax lot would have to undergo a proper "land division".  This closes the City provided loophole that builders are using and would make it impossible to develop a skinny home (or worse even, two) on your R-5 parcel ever.

It is precisely this consolidation that must be in place before a home with a develop-able side yard is sold.  If you see a house for sale with a side yard, stop in and ask if this has been done to save the yard from skinny house development.  It would be good advice to recommend to the seller that they stipulate in the sales contract that the lot be consolidated before closing.  This will deter builders and welcome buyers who would want to spare the yard and trees and preserve out neighborhood character.

The problem with an individual doing this is that it is expensive, it costs $2,645 to consolidate your lot. There are a few good folks here in Concordia who are urging our politicians to wave this fee for consolidation purposes only as this fee only exists because most people consolidate their lots to build on.

- Write your politicians - 

They need to understand these failed policies are deeply effecting the entire city.

Mayor Hales
Commissioner Fish
Commissioner Fritz
Commissioner Novick
Commissioner Saltzman 

- Talk to the various city departments - 

Development Services -  https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bds/
Planning and Sustainability - https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/
Join your neighborhood associations - https://www.portlandoregon.gov/oni/28385

- Register your tall trees as heritage trees - 

https://www.portlandoregon.gov/parks/40280

- Portland has always been responsive to grass roots change -

Don't give up, the mayor and city know there are problems. If we keep at it as a city, I truly believe we can get the city to take on wiser choices for smart development in our city. I as many people want to see Portland grow well and I believe we can, we just need to work together and not let these greedy developers snatch up all of Portland's develop-able land before it's too late...

Monday, August 18, 2014

Concordia being aggresivly built by Everett Custom Homes...

It's been a long few weeks for us here in Concordia. Though we lost the tree on 22nd Ave. We are not done with trying to prevent the building of a skinny home in it's place.

Vic Reemers has agreed to discuss selling the lot to a neighbor. We will see if this is something he will truly do or if it's just a game to waste more of our time while he quickly swoops in and builds against all of our best efforts.

We still have a lot of questions with what happened on our block. Why did they show up with unmarked trucks with no company affiliation whatsoever. Why did they refuse to show they were license bonded and insured? Why was the tree taken down when the lot hasn't even been confirmed as a build-able lot, why are they building a sewer line right now when the lot is still not confirmed as build-able?

Though the uniting force for our community was to save the tree, we found ourselves entrenched in a much larger and more troublesome problem here in Concordia and Portland at large.

In the last several weeks, Vic Reemers and Everett Custom homes has aggressively descended upon Concordia to stamp their cookie cutter homes in our beautiful community taking down several old growths for no real reason. There are at least 5-6 builds in our immediate area that I know of and probably more.

All of the homes that have lot splits are bought under LLCs, split then purchased by Everett Custom homes. One must have to ask, how on Earth did Vic get this many properties in such a short amount of time?

One block over on Highland St. Vic took these amazing tall Doug Firs down for a parking pad, yes I said that right, a parking pad for another skinny home...

Last week, I was notified about another cut down of an old growth for yet another skinny home. This beauty was on 27th Ave.... 



What we find so troublesome in Concordia is that all of this work is being done long before the lots are legally confirmed. The build on our block seems far too small to build and when taking a tape measure to their markings of the lot we don't get a full 25' which is what is required for a minimum to build... 



Upon asking more questions we come to the biggest one of all. Concordia is zoned legally as an R5 residential zone but somehow we got downgraded to an R-2.5 for micro lots. No one in the city has any real answers. 

Why is this happening and all over Portland? Eastmoreland has had to resort to protests...

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/07/east_moreland_residents_protes.html

Beaumont-Wilshire is under attack too...

http://bwnrg.blogspot.com/

Are we as a city really going to sit back and let these builders destroy the character of our beautiful city?

They are calling it infill as a nice way of making Portlander's think this is good for growth but it's not. It's greedy land grabs that are focusing on well established communities to make a faster buck and destroying their character in the process.

There are several blocks of this area that could use "revitalization" but that is not what Renaissance Homes and Everett Custom Homes are doing here. They are bullying their way into communities that have high value and building to make a quick buck off of established communities and destroying the neighborhoods character in the process.

Portland is rapidly being developed by only three builders. All of the new condos, skinny homes and giant "loomer" homes are being built by Wally Reemers, Vic Reemers (Everett Custom Homes) and Renaissance Homes. Why is the city giving such preferential treatment to just these three builders?

Do we really want suburbian builders to decide the fate of our city?






Sunday, August 3, 2014

August 3, 2014
KOIN continues to cover the story

http://koin.com/2014/08/03/sawdust-coming-reads-message-on-historic-tree/
APPARENTLY THE FACEBOOK PAGE FOR The Concordia Tree is being attacked--Cut Here?

We can post here





Write Richard Voss of Windemere who J2 may be associated with  richard.voss@windemere.com